ABSTRACT
In this study, we present the ultrasound imaging features of lymph nodes arising in the regional lymph node chain after the first or second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Ipsilateral lymphadenopathy adjacent to the vaccine injection site is an extremely rare but expected adverse reaction following COVID-19 vaccination. Although axillary lymphadenopathy is more common, cases of supraclavicular lymphadenopathy have also been reported after widespread vaccination against COVID-19. Ultrasonography examinations were performed on seven patients with no previous pathological conditions, who presented to our radiology department after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Bilateral axillary, supraclavicular and subclavicular lymph node stations were explored. These patients typically present with enlarged hypoechoic lymph nodes with the loss of fatty hilum, asymmetric or diffuse cortical thickening, and increased hilar and cortical vascularization on the color doppler ultrasonography of the ipsilateral axillary and supraclavicular regions. Radiologists and clinicians should be aware of the ultrasonographic features of these lymph nodes and should inform the patient that these lymph nodes are often a self-limiting process. Thus, unnecessary axillary lymph node biopsies should be avoided, and patients should be treated conservatively.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes severe pneumonia, caused an epidemic that started in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and spread to the whole world. COVID-19 mainly affects the respiratory system and causes the development of severe pneumonia and related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in some patients. We aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 pneumonia cases can be evaluated in different categories in clinical and radiological terms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: COVID-19 associated ARDS cases being treated with the diagnosis of severe pneumonia between March 21, 2020 and June 15, 2020 in Anesthesia Intensive Care Unit were examined and divided into 2 groups (type-L and type-H, total 29 cases) according to their clinical findings (according to whether they benefited from high PEEP and their lung compliance) and lung computed tomography findings (according to the severity of the ground glass appearance). The groups were compared with each other in terms of inflammatory markers [CRP (C reactive protein), ferritin, D Dimer, PCT (procalcitonin), white blood cell, lymphocyte count, arterial blood gas analysis] and imaging findings. RESULTS: It was observed that the prone position was beneficial in improving oxygenation in both H-type and L-type patients. 7 of 22 L-type patients were intubated and 5 of these patients died. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intubation times, hospital stays, cytokine levels, prone position application responses and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Are there two separate forms of COVID-19 pneumonia, such as h-type and l-type, or are they intertwined and describe the early and late stages of the disease? This question needs to be discussed. In addition, we believe that subtyping COVID-19 pneumonia patients does not make a difference in the treatments to be applied.